|
Graham
Cleghorn….victim of injustice in |
|
|
Home
> News Reports > 2006 |
|
|
|
For two years New
Zealander Graham Cleghorn has been locked up in a Cambodian jail serving a 20
year sentence for the rape of five teenage girls. He says he's innocent
and claims to be the victim of a set-up by the Cambodian Women's Crisis
Centre (CWCC). Cleghorn, 58, was
originally convicted in a trial which lasted nine hours and his lawyer didn't
speak. Then earlier this year Cleghorn's appeal was heard in "Graham was not in
the courtroom, no embassy representative was in the courtroom, none of his
witnesses or the lawyer were there in the courtroom... only the CWCC
representative was there and three girls," says Cleghorn's Cambodian
lawyer Dy Borima - one of the country's top criminal lawyers. The CWCC is Cleghorn told Charlotte
Glennie that the CWCC turned up at his village and offered people $US10,000
to say he had interfered with their children. He says no-one at his village
would do it so they went to other villages were they found girls who were
willing to testify against him. Cleghorn says the more
people that are arrested for sex offences the more overseas funding the CWCC
can get. He says he wants the CWCC investigated. CWCC director Ms
Chanthol says the claims are absurd. "We never pay for
anyone, yeah of course we pay for accommodation... they are poor they cannot
pay for food when they come to Phnom Penh to join the trial of course we we
pay for their transportation...but we never, ever pay any money," she
says. Chanthol says they had
263 cases last year and it would be impossible to pay them all $10,000 each. Cleghorn moved to Cleghorn says the only
one he ever had sex with was Baut Toer, who he refers to as his wife. Whether
they were ever married is questionable. She was 13 or 14 when she moved in
with Cleghorn and he says around four years later they began a relationship. The CWCC says he used
the girl as a pre-text to hide what he did with many children. Guilt or innocence
aside "Despite
our asking to be kept informed how was it that he and the embassy were
unaware of the appeal taking place? But I think more importantly we'll be
wanting to look to the future. How do we now redress the situation? How do we
work the system so that Graham gets a chance for a fair hearing - a chance to
put his case, his side of events to the appeal judge?" Says Rider.
|